I've been posting about how printmaking for me had been a TOOL in order to disseminate my message or dialogue in older posts. I can even tell that my message had change trough years or even better, it had been sophisticated, but at last in it root is mainly the same. In order to deliver this dialogue I've done some graffiti, music etc. Printmaking I had found by now its the medium that describe and contribute more to the context of my work and even farther I understand it also develop the dialogue to the contemporary social status. And this is rooted in all the discussion we had on all the specific tools printmaking bring to the artist, replication, low cost production etc. So at last it does not only contribute my work aesthetically but conceptually.

I preferred to be called artist it this answers one of the first questions.

Art by itself do not have attached any subject or concept in it "natural" essence. In other words art is a neutral system with the opportunity to develop its own codex trough an individual experience. One its the subject who molds the medium through cognitive process.

I've done some sculpture, ceramic, painting, performance, digital media, etc. Like I said printmaking at certain point answered to my reality.

Also right now I'm in the moment of asking myself how my subject can be stringer with other medium in specific circumstances? Well it started to change to a more 3dimensional state.

So at the end my stance its whenever my work and a medium fit and share the context of its subject. So now I'm an artist and who knows if other discipline at last brings something to my personal subject I''l take my chances and make another jump, at last art is the tool I'm using right now but the times may change maybe may the tools.